Journal info
|
||
Select Journal
Journals
Bratislava Medical Journal Endocrine Regulations General Physiology and Biophysics Neoplasma 2024 Ahead of print 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 Acta Virologica Studia Psychologica Cardiology Letters Psychológia a patopsych. dieťaťa Kovove Materialy-Metallic Materials Slovenská hudbaWebshop Cart
Your Cart is currently empty.
Info: Your browser does not accept cookies. To put products into your cart and purchase them you need to enable cookies.
Neoplasma Vol.57, No.4, p.369-376, 2010 |
||
Title: Optimization and it’s influence on value of doses in HDR and PDR brachytherapy | ||
Author: J. Skowronek, G. Zwierzchowski, T. Piotrowski, P. Milecki | ||
Abstract: The aim of this work is to examine the influence of the dose optimization procedure on the value of radiation doses in organs of risk and to compare value of doses measured in healthy tissues according to chosen different PDR brachytherapy (PDRBT) and HDR brachytherapy (HDRBT) fractionation schedule. Fifty one patients treated with PDRBT were qualified for calculations. This group included patients with head and neck cancer, brain tumor, breast cancer, sarcoma, penile cancer and rectal cancer. The doses were calculated in chosen critical points in surrounded healthy tissues. For all treatment plans the doses were compared with the use of the BED (Biologically Equivalent Dose) formula and PDR along with HDR values were calculated. Differences among total doses in PDRBT and different schemas of HDRBT in critical points before and after dose point and volume optimization, were analyzed. The same dependences were examined also for BEDs. One ascertained that in biologic equivalent (to PDR) HDRBT the increase of fraction dose from 4 Gy to 10 Gy caused the necessity of decrease of total dose in treatment area (p |
||
Keywords: BED, PDR brachytherapy, HDR brachytherapy, healthy tissues, optimization | ||
Year: 2010, Volume: 57, Issue: 4 | Page From: 369, Page To: 376 | |
doi:10.4149/neo_2010_04_369 |
||
|
download file |
|