Home HOME Studia Psychologica 2011 Studia Psychologica Vol.53, No.2, p.163-168, 2011

Journal info

Select Journal







Webshop Cart

Your Cart is currently empty.

Info: Your browser does not accept cookies. To put products into your cart and purchase them you need to enable cookies.

Studia Psychologica Vol.53, No.2, p.163-168, 2011

Title: ARE HUMANS REALLY THAT BAD AT THEORY-BASED JUDGMENTS? THE EFFECT OF EVOLUTIONARY RELEVANCE OF THE CONTENT
Author: Ivana HROMATKO, Josip HRGOVIĆ

Abstract: Humans constantly have to detect covariations among many events, especially the ones in their social surrounding. Imperfections of this process led some authors to argue that an “intuitive scientist” is not capable of precise assessment of covariations. Here we argue that the tasks used in previous studies contained information that could not have been relevant during our evolutionary past, and thus no functional heuristics could have evolved to successfully solve this kind of problems. To test this assumption we compared the accuracy of two kinds of theory-based judgments: in terms of our evolutionary past, one set of tasks contained relevant and the other irrelevant information. The participants were significantly more precise (but not faster) at judging the covariations between the “evolutionary relevant” variables. It seems that “intuitive scientist” can make a rather fair estimate of covariatons in nature, but only when the failure to do so might result in decreased chances of survival and/or reproduction.


Keywords: covariation assessment, theory-based judgments, domain specificity, evolutionary (ir)relevant judgments
Year: 2011, Volume: 53, Issue: 2 Page From: 163, Page To: 168

Price: 3.00 €






© AEPress s.r.o
Copyright notice: For any permission to reproduce, archive or otherwise use the documents in the ELiS, please contact AEP.