Home Bratislava Medical Journal 2012 Bratislava Medical Journal Vol.113, No.11, p.673–675, 2012

Journal info


 


Published Monthly, in English
Founded: 1919
ISSN 0006-9248
(E)ISSN 1336-0345

Impact factor 1.564

 

Aims and Scope
Editorial Info
Submission Guidelines

Select Journal







Webshop Cart

Your Cart is currently empty.

Info: Your browser does not accept cookies. To put products into your cart and purchase them you need to enable cookies.

Bratislava Medical Journal Vol.113, No.11, p.673–675, 2012

Title: Bone morphometry
Author: M. Jaffar, B. V. Murlimanju, V. V. Saralaya, L. V. Prabhu, K. U. Prashanth, A. Krishnamurthy

Abstract: Objectives: To compare anatomical measurements with that of radiological measurements.
Background: The radiological measurements are commonly used in clinical practice. It is well known that the anatomical measurements are more accurate than radiological. The comparison of anatomicoradiological measurements is not reported hitherto.
Methods: One human adult cadaveric femur bone was used for the present study. It was measured both anatomically and radiologically.
Results: In digital X- ray measurements, the length from the upper lip of fovea capitis to the most prominent part of greater trochanter was 87.2 mms, from the upper most part of greater trochanter to the isthmus it was 147.9 mms, mediolateral width of medullary cavity at the isthmus was 8.9 mms, the mediolateral width at the distal root of lesser trochanter was 18.5 mms, anteroposterior width of medullary cavity at the isthmus was 11.5 mms, the anteroposterior width at the distal root of lesser trochanter was 16.8 mms. The same measurements were 91.2 mms, 154.6 mms, 11.8 mms, 19.7 mms, 11.9 mms and 18.5 mms when taken anatomically using the digital vernier caliper.
Conclusion: The present study showed that in all the parameters measured the radiological values were slightly lesser than the anatomical values. Considering the variations in the values, the implants can be designed for a particular case in orthopedic surgery. We believe that this study adds an important reference in the scientific literature (Tab. 1, Fig. 2, Ref. 5).

Keywords: anatomical, femur, measurements, morphometry, radiological.
Year: 2012, Volume: 113, Issue: 11 Page From: 673, Page To: 675
doi:10.4149/BLL_2012_152


download file



© AEPress s.r.o
Copyright notice: For any permission to reproduce, archive or otherwise use the documents in the ELiS, please contact AEP.