Journal info
|
||||
Select Journal
Journals
Bratislava Medical Journal 2024 Ahead of print 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Endocrine Regulations General Physiology and Biophysics Neoplasma Acta Virologica Studia Psychologica Cardiology Letters Psychológia a patopsych. dieťaťa Kovove Materialy-Metallic Materials Slovenská hudbaWebshop Cart
Your Cart is currently empty.
Info: Your browser does not accept cookies. To put products into your cart and purchase them you need to enable cookies.
Bratislava Medical Journal Vol.113, No.11, p.673–675, 2012 |
||
Title: Bone morphometry | ||
Author: M. Jaffar, B. V. Murlimanju, V. V. Saralaya, L. V. Prabhu, K. U. Prashanth, A. Krishnamurthy | ||
Abstract: Objectives: To compare anatomical measurements with that of radiological measurements. Background: The radiological measurements are commonly used in clinical practice. It is well known that the anatomical measurements are more accurate than radiological. The comparison of anatomicoradiological measurements is not reported hitherto. Methods: One human adult cadaveric femur bone was used for the present study. It was measured both anatomically and radiologically. Results: In digital X- ray measurements, the length from the upper lip of fovea capitis to the most prominent part of greater trochanter was 87.2 mms, from the upper most part of greater trochanter to the isthmus it was 147.9 mms, mediolateral width of medullary cavity at the isthmus was 8.9 mms, the mediolateral width at the distal root of lesser trochanter was 18.5 mms, anteroposterior width of medullary cavity at the isthmus was 11.5 mms, the anteroposterior width at the distal root of lesser trochanter was 16.8 mms. The same measurements were 91.2 mms, 154.6 mms, 11.8 mms, 19.7 mms, 11.9 mms and 18.5 mms when taken anatomically using the digital vernier caliper. Conclusion: The present study showed that in all the parameters measured the radiological values were slightly lesser than the anatomical values. Considering the variations in the values, the implants can be designed for a particular case in orthopedic surgery. We believe that this study adds an important reference in the scientific literature (Tab. 1, Fig. 2, Ref. 5). |
||
Keywords: anatomical, femur, measurements, morphometry, radiological. | ||
Year: 2012, Volume: 113, Issue: 11 | Page From: 673, Page To: 675 | |
doi:10.4149/BLL_2012_152 |
||
|
download file |
|