Journal info
|
||
Select Journal
Journals
Bratislava Medical Journal Endocrine Regulations General Physiology and Biophysics Neoplasma 2024 Ahead of print 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 Acta Virologica Studia Psychologica Cardiology Letters Psychológia a patopsych. dieťaťa Kovove Materialy-Metallic Materials Slovenská hudbaWebshop Cart
Neoplasma Vol.60, No.3, p.302-308, 2013 |
||
Title: Electronic portal imaging registration in breast cancer radiotherapy verification: Analysis of inter-observer agreement among different categories of health practitioners | ||
Author: B. A. JERECZEK-FOSSA, L. SANTORO, S. P. COLANGIONE, L. MORSELLI, C. FODOR, B. VISCHIONI, D. ROZZA, A. LEPPA, R. CAMBRIA, M. C. LEONARDI, A. MORRA, G. BARONI, S. ZURRIDA, R. ORECCHIA | ||
Abstract: Electronic portal imaging (EPI) is commonly used to identify and correct for inter-fraction variability in tangential breast irradiation. Based on the institutional policy, EPI registration is performed by either radiation oncologist or therapist. Little data is available on the inter-observer agreement in EPI registration among different health practitioners. The aim of our study was to analyze inter-observer agreement among radiation oncologists and therapists in the evaluation of EPI for breast cancer radiotherapy verification. EPI data of 40 patients treated with tangential fields were independently reviewed by a radiation oncologist (on-line, just before treatment) and off-line by junior and senior therapists. Displacement of each EPI image with respect to the digital reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) was quantified using manual EPI registration based on bony marks with the corresponding DRRs. Agreement between observers was evaluated using weighted Cohen’s Kappa statistics. In 95% out of 720 EPI-DRR comparisons, the EPI-DRR misalignment was < 5 mm. The difference between observers was < 2 mm in 666 (92.5%) out of all 720 delta values. High inter-observer agreement was found, with weighted Cohen’s Kappa values attesting evaluation overlaps ranging from moderate (among therapists) to almost perfect (among radiation oncologist and therapists). The high agreement among the observers demonstrated the precision of breast localization using EPI. These findings suggest that routine EPI-based patient set-up verification in breast cancer radiotherapy can be safely entrusted to trained therapists (supervision should be assured based on the local tasks definition). Our study might be useful in quality assurance and in the optimization of workload in the radiotherapy departments. They might allow for wider implementation of complex and evolving radiotherapy technologies. |
||
Keywords: EPI, breast cancer radiotherapy, radiation oncologist, radiation therapist, inter-observer agreement, Kappa statistics | ||
Published online: 30-Jan-2013 | ||
Year: 2013, Volume: 60, Issue: 3 | Page From: 302, Page To: 308 | |
doi:10.4149/neo_2013_040 |
||
|
download file |
|