Journal info
|
||
Select Journal
Journals
Bratislava Medical Journal Endocrine Regulations General Physiology and Biophysics Neoplasma 2024 Ahead of print 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 Acta Virologica Studia Psychologica Cardiology Letters Psychológia a patopsych. dieťaťa Kovove Materialy-Metallic Materials Slovenská hudbaWebshop Cart
Your Cart is currently empty.
Info: Your browser does not accept cookies. To put products into your cart and purchase them you need to enable cookies.
Neoplasma Vol.69, No.3, p.729–740, 2022 |
||
Title: New insights into the diagnostic characteristics and clinical application of serum biomarkers for lung cancer, and human epididymis protein 4 as a new biomarker? | ||
Author: Ming Li, Yi Zhang, Li Jiang, Yan Li, Gang Li, Jianping Zhou, Chen Yang, Xinhui Li, Wei Qu, Yong Chen, Qing Chen, Shukui Wang, Jinliang Xing, Huayi Huang | ||
Abstract: The value of serum tumor biomarkers used for lung cancer diagnosis is still controversial in clinical practice. This study aimed to further dissect and evaluate the clinical value of serum progastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA21-1) together with a potential new biomarker, the human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) for lung cancer diagnosis, in a large cohort of a Chinese population. Ostensibly healthy individuals, as well as those with benign non-cancerous diseases, benign tumors, lung cancers, and other types of malignancies, were enrolled in the study. Serum ProGRP, NSE, SCC-Ag, CEA, CYFRA21-1, and HE4 were analyzed using the chemiluminescence immunoassay. Data were analyzed utilizing the SPSS and GraphPad Prism software. Detailed dissection of the diagnostic characteristics of serum 6 biomarkers on lung cancer was performed. All 6 biomarkers showed capabilities in characterizing lung cancer from other diseases. ProGRP and NSE were highly specific to small cell lung cancer (SCLC); SCC-Ag was a fair biomarker for NSCLC, specifically SCC histotype; CEA showed specific to SCLC, followed by NSCLC; CYFRA21-1 was a good biomarker for both SCLC and NSCLC; HE4 showed high specific to SCLC. For NSCLC characterization, CYFRA21-1+HE4+CEA was the best combinatory pattern in the terms of diagnostic performance (AUC 0.8110). The best combinatory analysis for SCLC was ProGRP+NSE+HE4 (AUC = 0.9282). Patients with advanced stage, larger tumor, males, and age 50 or older had higher serum biomarkers levels than those with early stage, smaller tumor, females, and age under 50. Six biomarkers had capabilities in characterizing lung cancer with high or fair diagnostic performance. HE4 is a potential biomarker for both SCLC and NSCLC diagnosis, which merits further investigation. |
||
Keywords: lung cancer; serum biomarkers; tumor histological type; human epididymis protein 4 (HE4); diagnostic performance | ||
Published online: 26-Apr-2022 | ||
Year: 2022, Volume: 69, Issue: 3 | Page From: 729, Page To: 740 | |
doi:10.4149/neo_2022_220207N144 |
||
|
download file |
|