Home Neoplasma 2022 Neoplasma Vol.69, No.6, p. 1466–1473, 2022

Journal info


6 times a year.
Founded: 1954
ISSN 0028-2685
ISSN 1338-4317 (online)

Published in English

Editorial Info
Abstracted and Indexed
Submission Guidelines

Select Journal







Webshop Cart

Your Cart is currently empty.

Info: Your browser does not accept cookies. To put products into your cart and purchase them you need to enable cookies.

Neoplasma Vol.69, No.6, p. 1466–1473, 2022

Title: Burkitt lymphoma-a retrospective analysis of data from the Registry of the Czech Lymphoma Study Group with external validation of the Burkitt lymphoma International Prognostic Index
Author: Alice SÝKOROVÁ, Vít PROCHÁZKA, Heidi MÓCIKOVÁ, Andrea JANÍKOVÁ, Robert PYTLÍK, David BELADA, Kateřina BENEŠOVÁ, Pavel KLENER Jr., Juraj ĎURAŠ, Lukáš SMOLEJ, Vít CAMPR, Petra BLAHOVCOVÁ, Marek TRNĚNÝ

Abstract:

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is a rare subtype of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with an aggressive course. To refine the individual patient’s prognosis, the International Prognostic Index for BL (BL-IPI) was recently developed and 4 risk factors (RF) were determined as optimal prognostic cut-off by multivariate analysis: age ≥40 years, lactate dehydrogenase >3× upper limit of normal, ECOG performance status ≥2, and central nervous system involvement. The BL-IPI distinguishes 3 prognostic groups, low (without RF), intermediate (1 RF), and high risk (2–4 RF), with significant differences in survival. The aim of the current project was to perform an external validation of the BL-IPI in 101 patients from the Registry of Czech Lymphoma Study Group diagnosed between 1999 and 2016 (median age, 45 years).

The median follow-up was 50.4 months. The induction treatment included rituximab plus chemotherapy in 82% and chemotherapy alone in 18%. The overall response rate was 78% and the complete remission rate was 73%. According to BL-IPI, low/intermediate/high risk was present in 21/35/45% of patients, showing high similarity to the training BL-IPI US (United States) dataset (18/36/46%). There were significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with high vs. intermediate risk (PFS: hazard ratio 0.16, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.31, p<0.0001; OS: hazard ratio 0.17, 95% confidence interval 0.09–0.35, p<0.0001) but not between patients with low vs. intermediate risk. The 3-year OS probability according to BL-IPI with low/intermediate/high risk was 96/76/59% in the BL-IPI training dataset vs. 95/85/45% in our external validation cohort; the 3-year PFS probability with low/intermediate/high risk was 92/72/53% in the BL-IPI training dataset vs. 95/85/42% in our cohort. In summary, our external validation of the BL-IPI confirmed a good separation of high-risk patients, who have a poor prognosis and for whom the new therapeutic approaches are needed; patients with low and intermediate risk had favorable clinical outcomes, and differences between these groups were not significant, likely due to a small number of patients.



Keywords:
Published online: 30-Dec-2022
Year: 2022, Volume: 69, Issue: 6 Page From: 1466, Page To: 1473
doi:10.4149/neo_2022_221030N1064


download file



© AEPress s.r.o
Copyright notice: For any permission to reproduce, archive or otherwise use the documents in the ELiS, please contact AEP.